Lumis research

Reason under uncertainty. Act within boundaries.

How can intelligent systems understand and safely adapt complex operational environments? Our research begins with that question, and with experiments that can prove us wrong.

Research is part of the system

Trustworthy autonomy starts with better questions.

Research in progress

How should a system reason when the evidence is incomplete?

Our research connects guarded recovery, competing hypotheses, active evidence acquisition, and verification.

Read about our first paper

Reference architecture available as an arXiv preprint (2608.01955). Peer review is pending; no acceptance is claimed.

Publications

Preprint · arXiv · August 2026

Agentic Self-Healing for Data & AI Pipelines: An Affordable Vendor-Agnostic Architecture using Open-Source Software

Eshun, Murage, Muoki, Chen, Adjignon, Staar, Angélil. The reference architecture Lumis grew from. Peer review is pending.

System study · October 2026

Did it look, or did it guess?

Fifteen injected failures on the GridCast reference estate, six investigators, one model. Methods, results, and what went wrong.

Evidence-seeking diagnosis

Do explicit competing hypotheses and targeted evidence improve diagnosis compared with rules, a single model call, and an unguided tool agent? First results on GridCast say yes, with one model and small samples.

First results

Operational graphs

Investigating which dependency, lineage, change, and policy relationships materially improve the quality of operational reasoning.

Research direction

GridCast reference estate

A synthetic electricity-forecasting estate on Kubernetes with fifteen reproducible failures, injected through the channels they would use in real life. It is a testbed for evaluation, not a live utility deployment.

Reference estate · first results

Constrained and edge diagnosis

Studying how much grounded diagnosis can run locally under limits on memory, compute, energy, and connectivity.

Long-term research
A large analogue control room with rows of gauges and switches

Why it matters

Operators have always reasoned under uncertainty.

Control rooms made system state legible to people. Our research asks how software can do the same for systems too complex to read at a glance — and stay accountable while it does.

Photograph: Frantisek Duris / Unsplash · illustrative

What we measure

Evaluate the whole loop.

Baselines, not anecdotes.

Every result is compared against what an engineer would actually try: deterministic rules, a model given only the alert, a single model call with curated evidence, and a tool-using model without Lumis’ structure.

The first comparison is published, with methods, transcripts and mistakes: one synthetic estate, one model, two runs per scenario. It is a starting point, not a benchmark.

Read the GridCast studyDiscuss research collaboration